Quiz Entry - updated: 2026.09.18
Compared side by side, how do virtue ethics, duty ethics and consequentialist ethics differ?
They ask what kind of person to be, what one is obliged to do, and what results to bring about — and correspondingly locate ethical behaviour in character, in duty, and in outcomes.
| Virtue / disposition ethics | Duty ethics | Consequentialist ethics | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The question | What kind of person should I be (or try to be), and what will my actions show about my character? | What are my obligations in this situation, and what are the things I should never do? | What kind of results should I achieve (or try to produce)? |
| Focus | Tries to identify the character traits — virtues and vices — that might motivate the people involved | Directs attention to the duties that exist prior to the situation, and determines the obligations | Directs attention to the future effects of an action on everyone directly or indirectly affected |
| Ethical behaviour is | What a fully virtuous person would do in these circumstances | Always doing the right thing: one may never fail to do one's duty | The action that has the best consequences |
| Aim / motivation | To develop one's own character | To carry out the right action | To do the best |
| Short form | Will the good, follow your conscience | Do what duty requires, out of duty | Achieve the good, attend to the consequences |
Read the "focus" row in time order and the structure becomes memorable: duty ethics looks backwards to obligations that already existed before the situation arose, consequentialism looks forwards to effects, and virtue ethics looks sideways at the person standing in the middle.
Tip: Character – Duty – Outcome. Or in the German triad: Können – Sollen – Wollen.
Go deeper:
Wikipedia: Normative ethics — the same three-way comparison from a different angle, plus the families this table leaves out.